Trust in Signals and the Origins of Disagreement

Ing-Haw Cheng, Alice Hsiaw - Dec 14, 2018

Working Paper No.  00047-00

Why do individuals interpret the same information differently? We propose that individuals follow Bayes' Rule when forming posteriors with one exception: when assessing the credibility of signal sources, they "double-dip" the data and use already updated beliefs instead of their priors. Individuals who make this mistake either over- or underreact to new information depending on the order in which they received previous signals. Traders engage in excessive speculation associated with price bubbles and crashes. Our model provides a theory of the origins of disagreement: individuals disagree about both unknown states and credibility despite sharing common priors and information.

Download Paper

complementarities organizational economics supply chain disagreement learning expectations speculation bubbles

Newer Versions

Trust in Signals and the Origins of Disagreement